Former President Donald Trump has stirred controversy by asserting that pregnant women who take paracetamol (also known as acetaminophen) are increasing the risk that their children will develop autism. He made the claim during a public appearance, citing what he described as “new research.”
Trump insisted that many mothers do not understand the danger and may be contributing to the rise in autism cases simply by taking what seems to be a harmless over-the-counter drug during pregnancy. His claim has drawn immediate reaction from medical professionals, scientists, and advocacy groups, many of whom warn that the evidence does not support his conclusion.
Medical experts emphasize that paracetamol is widely considered safe when used appropriately in pregnancy, particularly for managing fever or pain, and that existing research does not establish a conclusive causal link to autism. Some studies have explored associations between prenatal acetaminophen exposure and neurodevelopmental variations in children, but researchers caution that association is not the same as causation. Factors such as dosage, frequency, timing during pregnancy, genetics, and environmental influences all play roles that make drawing a direct line problematic.
Critics argue that Trump’s sweeping claim could spread fear and discourage pregnant women from seeking care for serious pain or fever, potentially putting their health and that of their unborn child at risk. Healthcare professionals stress that untreated fever can itself pose serious danger to a developing fetus. They urge women to consult their physicians before stopping or starting any medication during pregnancy.
In response to the backlash, some scientists have called for more rigorous research to clarify whether any risk exists, and under what conditions. They also emphasize that pregnant women should not make medication decisions based on political claims or media headlines, but rather on medical advice and well-established clinical guidelines.
Though Trump framed his statement as a warning, his remarks have sparked debate over how medical messaging should be handled by public figures. Many believe that when nonexperts present bold health claims, it becomes even more vital for the public to hear reasoned, science-based responses from qualified professionals.
Emmanuel Onwuka 
Raphael Obasiohia